Skip to main content

About your Search

20120925
20121003
STATION
FBC 47
LANGUAGE
English 47
Search Results 0 to 46 of about 47 (some duplicates have been removed)
goes down? do we want four more years of trillion dollar deficits? i don't believe we can afford four more years like the last four years. lou: a new report highlights governor rome -- governor romney's criticisms showing household incomes fell by an average rate of more than 8%. the census bureau revealing the number of people in poverty rose by 3 million in the first three years of the obama administration. we'll take all of that here tonight with former economic adviser to president reagan, economists, author laffer, and digital politics editor, and former bush adviser brad blakeman to separate facts from fiction in the world of presidential polls and strategies. early voting has presidential votes cast in more than half the country by next week. shannon has our report. the president's poll numbers in ohio getting a boost from stronger economic numbers, but there's head winds pressuring the campaign. the white house chief correspondent, ed henry, reports. >> since early voting starts tuesday here in ohio, it was a familiar script for president obama on his 29th visit to the buckeye
, there are also some tax hikes here, and wouldn't that do something to decrease the deficit? >> yes, it's the only specific tax increase that-- of both candidates and if you would close the deficit and turn some of the tacks to the higher levels, and the revenues for the government, revenue enhancement. however, to cost patriotism to say a small fraction of the country will have an extra tax burden, everybody has to pay more taxes, in fact, if you combine the tax proposals of mitt romney and president obama, together you would have a patriotic plan where you're removing some of the benefits of the lower people the last 10, 15 years and then, we would have higher revenues cross the board and that would lower the deficit the most, and the other things in this that are not particularly patriotic. a lot of the obama proposals think there's a small group that can fix the problems. the thing with the car thing, we all have to pay a higher gas tax and help the deficit, and have the cars making 80 miles per hour and we're the ones driving far. >> you say you want to wave the flag for patriotism, you say t
the deficit by $4 trillion and raise the taxes on the wealthy. that means nothing in an economy where we would be running more than $1 trillion the annual deficit. mitt romney needs to come out and just do the arithmetic for people. the average american understands state of this economy. the banks on wall street monday doing good,. ashley: case in point. ohio, which is a very important swing state, if you look at their personal income since december 2007, it has risen a whopping 2.1%. in nearly five years. mr. obama has a lead not. >> yes, the pools are an open question. i don't buy it, but i'm not a professional pollster. i think we do raises another interesting point. which is what this administration promises, we did not promise certain things -- but he promised that he would have the deficit, and where are we? the deficit has doubled and the president said that he would reduce the cost of health care. that has gone on. ashley: the numbers are there. let's bring in our next guest. he talks about the need for economic patriotism. >> given how many times we have heard people from the left ref
, trying to do deficit reduction is raising taxes and not doing the cutting on the other end. why don't we try a different approach? why don't we try an approach and cut stuff and then maybe raise, at thats later? >> we can't cut. we can't cut. we can't cut. >> then we're might as well as go down in flames if we can't cut. >> raise taxes. >> neil: charles, one of the interesting things this week, the 47% romney thing and i go back and forth no matter who's nose got out of joint as a result of the comments picked up at a fundraiser. the 47% should stagger you, how we get 47% don't pay taxes. i take nothing away from those on social security, retirement. for whatever reason we're close to paying no federal income taxes today and yet, the only way to correct this, and i think that ben is it an earnest guy and earnestly reading the map of the land is well, we're going to have to hike taxes on the well-to-do or do something like that because the spending cuts and-- so here we go on this group that we always hit up despite the fact that half aren't getting in at all. >> the spending cuts will ne
the federal deficit, increase taxes and comply with spending cuts. the fed should not be doing anything else. to you agree with that? >> you know what, i don't agree with any of that. i am a part of that survey. and the bottom line is is that what i want to see his no increase in tax rate and a big spending cuts. the u.s. is spending too much. we are spending 24% of gdp. that is a huge burden on our economy. it's like -- and as a resource that usually carries 112-pound jockey having to carry a 250-pound jockey. there's no way that horse to win the race or run fast. we need to put this jockey on a diet. that's what we have to do. and raising tax rates on the course, the economy, that accomplishes the wrong thing. the way you balance the budget is you cut spending, and that will also boost growth in the u.s. economy. cheryl: i want to ask you this before we leave. this is something i kind of could not believe. we had the chief u.s. equity strategist at morgan stanley say basically we could kick qe for by the end of the year. possible? >> you know, i personally don't think so. this goes back to
? >> the president obama looks nothing like the candidate obama. he talked about lowering the deficit in half, not redistributing wealth. and not, as he said, hurting the taxpayer and getting rid of broad and things like that. i think these economists look at numbers and they see reality, they feature $6 trillion in debt. and they figure it is time to move on. neil: having said that, they seem to have crunched the numbers and looked on the weakness of this recovery and concluded maybe a fresh start is in order. but doesn't factor in a smart money angle that we are missing? smart money seems to be saying that there is not much money for this recovery to be had. >> will look at their records. we have president obama who hasn't had any experience in the private sector and we have governor romney who does understand. america, yes, we do need a ceo in chief. we also need someone who understands that the business leadership to be able to broker and work in washington where there is a lot of polarized politics. governor romney is adjusting policies that democrats and republicans can agree. we need t
directly now. the annotated obama, how 90% of the deficit becomes somebody else's fault. a scathing editorial debunks the president's assertions about all the that he inherited. and frequently joining "varney & company" we appreciate you being with us, mark. >> good to see you, always a pleasure. stuart: good. now, the president says he's not responsible for the debt largely, not concerned about it in the short-term. i put it to you, that this is being irresponsible. he's getting away with it because a lot of people don't understand the jargon, your eyes glaze over when you start to talk about debt and deficit, he can get away with it, but he's dismissing extremely important part of america's financial life and i think being irresponsible. how do you respond? >> i don't think that he's dismissing it at all. in fact, the president said many times that the debt, the long-term debt is a serious problem and that's why he signed over 2 trillion dollars in spending cuts during his administration. but the core question you're raising is, who really is responsible for this. the congressiona
deficits. president obama says it's not a concern in the short-term. the debate tomorrow night and the obama camp there's concern that he is so smart, we won't understand what he's saying and this morning the media displays headlines that are clearly negative on governor romney. the dow will open higher again. congress is said to be working on a budget deal. that's a plus for stocks, but question, has the little guy missed this rally? we've got it all. wait till you hear herman cain go after a student heckler and wait until you see bill o'reilly on this program today. "varney & company" is about to begin. [ male announcer ] the markets keep moving. make sure the news keeps coming with thinkorswim by td ameritrade. use the news links breaking stories with possible breakout stocks, options with potential opportunity, futures and forex with in-depth analysis. it's an all-you-can-eat buffet for all things trading. thinkorswim by td ameritrade. it doesn't just deliver news. it's making news. trade commission free for 60 days, plus get up to $600 when you open an account. pfollow the
policymakers but american people, we want a strong agreeing economy, that is the goal, not just deficit reduction or reducing taxes or reform, get this economy to lead in the world, that is what we need, a lot can be done, we can have tax reform, closes loopholes and lower rates for companies and individuals. we can cut spending in a way that we help with growth. and help with jobs. >> what do you think that ratio should be? spending cuts. >> neil, it is the $64 question, only policymakers can decided that. neil: but they are not deciding it. >> in past, in different time its was 50/50, i doubt you should to that now, during the budget talks in last year, they talked about three to one spending cuts over tax increases, you can put it did where you want, but in the condition we're in first of all you can't do this overnight, you need a 10 year plan because right now, the economy is not surging forward. neil: looking at december 31, and i guess that is what i want to raise with you, dennis, one thing paul ryan told me earlier, he does not think, unlike some more conservative purists in th
democrat bonn the president's deficit reduction committee with alan simpson and pretty good and we should point out he is there too but the president ignored a lot of his -- [talking over each other] >> he is seen as a guy who can bring democrats and republicans like him. the other guy out there whose name is bounced around and bounced around for four years is the ceo of black rock. i consider him a friend. the upside to larry is clearly there is no smarter guy on wall street that i know. he saw between trading and an entrepreneur. and associated -- the obama administration -- there's a european financial crisis, he understands financial instruments, and erskine bowles is a different dynamic. really going to do that. you want to make a deal with republicans and he is the guy to do it but larry as different depending on how you approach it. the wall street firms are going around. with larry taking the job, and natural successor at black rock. i just -- maybe he does. melissa: such a massive pay cut. [talking over each other] charlie: erskine bowles is no stranger to wall street. melissa: t
close the deficit next year. if you look at example. this was tried in oregon in 2010. it didn't bring the revenue they thought. tried the same experiment in illinois. didn't bring in the revenue they thought. do you think down the line though, somebody will have a scorecard and say this is what you thought it would bring in but it didn't happen? >> well they will have to, melissa. so initially, you're absolutely right. initially when you raise taxes, remember we're halfway through a tax year. so you can't, you can't move today and not claim you earned that money in france. so people will have to pay higher taxes this year. so they might have a little bit better of a budget over the next 12, maybe, 18 months. but after this, things start to fall apart. but more importantly, businesses are going to see growth slow down and they're going to have to lay off workers. this is where the polls and the politics starts to work against the president. melissa: i worry this is where it comes home to the u.s. because immediately today all across the news when people were reporting this story i say
about new spending at a time when people are very concerned about debt and deficit. but as these folks continue to believe that their man is going to carry the day on november november 6th, they probably want to get in line first. neil: if there is always the risk when word of this leaks out that they look like they are decorating the office before they are guaranteed they're going to have it. now, if you are barack obama you already have it. what is to stop you from san amide looked at that new drug. you know what i mean. it does seem to be a sense that, you know, they are planning for a victory that might not happen. if this gets out then it could strike a lot of voters as, at the very least, arrogant. >> i think that they are forgetting that president obama is not the only piece of the puzzle. you still have a republican house which republicans that it will a lot to. mitt romney loses, paul ryan will still be the budget chairman. democrats can line up all these big spending initiatives if they want to, but the fact is that the house is still going to be majority republican. if repub
backtracking? >> i think he's trying to put the emphasis on deficit reduction because many' probably, guessing, i haven't seen it, in the polling probably concerning people more than anything else. as long as people can feel, i'm not going to get a tax increase, might think he's producing about as much enthusiasm as optimism as he needs to produce to get our economy going. stuart: i'm reading between the lines, you don't care for that. >> i'm a big tax cutter, cut taxes 23 times as mayor, 3 billion. it worked for me. i cut the hotel tax, collected more from the lower tax than the higher tax, i'm convinced if you got rid of the sales tax in new york you'd see another 500,000 jobs here. you'd make it up in income tax what you lose in sales tax. stuart: is governor romney then responding to the attacks from the obama camp that say you just want to cut taxes for the rich and that attack line is working? so governor romney pulls back and says, oh, we're not going to cut taxes as much-- >> i suspect it has more to do with internal polls and people worried about the deficit and wants to show he's ser
trillion dollars deficits. certainly, the numbers do not quite add up at the federal level. if we can have some certainty and understand what will happen, i think the states are good stewards and will react accordingly. melissa: interesting. thank you. lori: let's talk about healthcare cost and how they are soaring in this country. fox news medical correspondent doctor marc siegel joins us now. this is a great debate going on in the healthcare industry. do you spend more on pre-screenings to obviously have to come up with these costs later on? >> here is where i think it pans out. this is ovarian and prostate cancer awareness month. there has been a lot of debates in the past year. we should not be screening for ovarian cancer. we are doing a lot of unnecessary tests and doing false positive testing. with the prostate that it is even more of an issue. they say do not do the esa. they have literally cut down by 50% prostate death over the past decade. we are spending over $100,000 per patient. if you wait, without it 90% of the time the cancer comes late. the preventive services task force
the republican party has gotten lost. we cannot afford any tax cuts. we have to deal with our deficit. that will mean spending cuts for everybody. dagen: is it a mistake to run on this at all? how can you focus been on, because the issue is growth and jobs. how do you run and talk about that without linking tax policy to it somehow? the opposite would be saying we will get rid of these deductions. some people taxes will go up. that will not win you to white house, will it? >> both parties have been -- we cannot afford to give anybody anything anymore. we are broke. we are running a trillion dollars deficit. once we start paying a real normal interest rate on that 20 trillion, it will send the budget even deeper. dagen: all of what you are saying makes perfect sense. i have argued for years that the american people will not vote to pick that until they feel it is home. runaway inflation like the 1970s and skyhigh interest rates like people saw 30 some odd years ago. that is not the case today. if it was laid out just like that, do you think they would vote based on that? >> i think the
budgett deficits. >> right. >> why wouldn't this help the state's bottom line? this is happening in arizona, where property taxes are next to nothing anymore, because there's no housing market anymore. why wouldn't this be a good thing? >> it is a good thing. i haven't heard one single good argument why not to do this. you're not rushing kids through, you're allowing them to rush through if they so desire. that's what this is supposed to be about. kids that can advance should advance if they want to. if it saves money all the better. why not save money if you can if it's improving the lots of kids that want to achieve. we should reward achievement in this country. this is a good way to start. >> nobody is saying you shouldn't do that, jim. >> todd? >> jim, that's great. nobody is saying we want to destroy success. we get that. however, you have to assume with property taxes, you saw a population growth. to think property taxes would actually drop because you subtract two years from a high school education -- >> i agree with you. they're not going to drop. >> that's not -- hold on
of this mistake may only be a drop in the bucket when it comes to trillion dollars deficit but every little bit counts.
politicians who go to washington dc and say look at the debt and deficit and say that we can't continue this anymore, we have to cut back on these programs, what we are going to see is a competition among the takers and the makers and greece in the process we have seen in europe, i am afraid, will come to america. cheryl: cheryl: kyle, thank you so much. thank you, coyote. meanwhile, let me ask you this. the circuit have what it takes to succeed in college? more than half of high school graduations do not. that is according to a new college survey. the sats failed to combine the indicator of kids to succeed. it should be called action. coming at the end of the hour, we are looking at how to fix these problems at an early age. also, still to come, help is on the way for stay-at-home moms. has the housing market hit bottom? a new report says that things are actually looking up i know the name of eight princesses. i'm an expert on softball. and tea parties. i'll have more awkward conversations than i'm equipped for because i'm raising two girls on my own. i'll worry about the economy more
. with deficits, federal government deficits in area of 9% per year and with the country not growing, the gdp not growing, the government debt increases about 9.5% per year. so as of next year, it will be close to about 92%. the year after that, it will be over 100%. there has to be recognition quickly they have underlying problems they need to address. tracy: but if they get their bailout, does that set precedent for the rest of the eurozone? there will certainly be other countries lining up to collect their money as well? >> it's already happened. in fact greece has asked for some support. ireland has asked for support and portugal. the basic underlying problem is that the productivity in the northern part of europe has grown a lot faster than it has in the southern part. when you're be taking about $300 worth of plastic and steel and converting it into $70,000 bmw or mercedes, and you can do that with more machines than you used to before, versus the, waiter working faster or farmer trying to grow faster, it is obvious that the product difficult rates in northern europe are growing faster
. it is that number that worries moody's. school system is already facing a billion dollar deficit in 2014. well, still to come, romney's people trying to lower expectations for next week's debate. his steaks. and the film that sparked violence and average around the world. the anti is law movie is banned in other countries. what about your? answers next. lori: freedom of speech under fire. one man's video, world leaders up in arms a lori: outrage across the world with his entire islam you to video under arrest. could face up to three years behind bars for allegedly violating his parole and lying about his involvement in the film. this as global leaders feared nuys the very notion of free speech. joining me now. great to see you. first, the filmmaker. and so let you know how to pronounce his name. >> that's why he was arrested. people have said, how can he be arrested on a probation violation? because we don't know who he is. you will even give us his real name. lori: an information gathering exercise and the part of the stories. >> more than that because he as a probation violation on check wri
to them. the larger concern is the economic situation here. oddly enough the federal deficit. ashley: it is interesting because a lot of the economic data, durable goods, we did not see a big selloff on the market at all. people not excited about stimulus in china and the budget. >> i would say those are probably shorter-term things. when people think about their investment career, they think on a longer-term and the things that will really affect that, they are not overseas, they are here. ashley: what about the fed and twqe3, is that just a short-term fix? >> all of our investors are self-directed making their own directions, bu but i'm not envisioning a scenario where we will see a drop some of your previous guests have mentioned. if we were to see that, we would have seen it with the vix. ashley: was the biggest trend you're seeing with investors right now? >> i think one of the trend is we are seeing in our world, a secular trend across industry, people keep talking about declining equity volumes and declining since 2008 but what they are missing is the derivatives volume steadi
out to vote on issues like unemployment, debt and deficit spending and obamacare, well you could make an argument those three issues are still out there. so are those voters still out there? you would argue they are but will they turn out to vote? that will be the key in early november. melissa: bill hemmer, thank you so much. great stuff. apeciate it. >> good to be with you, melissa. melissa: football fans everywhere, hold your breath. the nfl and the referees union may be yards away from getting a deal done. how will the lockout affect the league's bottom line? we're crunching those numbers next. >>> no secret economic growth is sluggish. maybe $488 billion in new regulation costs have something to do with it. what do you think? we have details from a stunning report from u.s. red tape? do you ever have too much money? i know you have too much u.s. regulations. ♪ . melissa: good news for football fans. there are report that is the nfl could be close to reaching an agreement with the union for referees. we've been following the nfl lockout since monday night's controversyal call. t
they could do? >> yeah. i think they could focus on the trade deficit with china because the money goes to china is money that leaves but doesn't come back to, buy foreign products but doesn't buy american products. that is one problem. the other is, if we develop more domestic energy even consuming same amount that is much less for the middle east that doesn't come back. finally, i think, small businesses could use a lot of help from the banks. that is banks were more able and ready to lend. and recognizing that the, the banking crisis that we had in 2008 and nine wasn't from lack of regulation but it was failure of regulations we had. melissa: yeah. >> dodd-frank was really more than we needed. sarbanes-oxley was supposed to solve most of those problems. melissa: clint, is there one thing the government could do to help you out right now? >> yeah, just get the hell out of the way. that's all i'm asking. get out of the way. melissa: clint, you're not one to mince words. i think i love you. i mean thank you for coming on. >> i like that. melissa: yeah i do too. thanks, guys. moving on t
dollar deficit we'll not spend federal fund to subsidize a couples making over $100,000 a year. melissa: why should have charity for anyone in that case? i wonder who is the government official that decides at what point do we draw the line and say, this person deserves it, even though they didn't pay into it, at that level beyond that date and this next very first person does not deserve it and that's where the cuttoff is? i have the problem with someone in washington making that decision for any family. >> well, of course that is the problem with government intervention is that it is very blunt. it is very broad. the government doesn't do a very good job of handling many things. melissa: no. >> but at the same time, you have to draw a line somewhere and say look, we're in a horrible fiscal situation. we've got to make cutbacks. imagine you've got two-income couple, a doctor and lawyer and the lawyer loses his job. well that is still a family with a six figure income there. why should we be taxing all americans to send them benefits? i mean --. melissa: i don't know, james. i don't wan
, thank you. narrowing the trade deficit and keeping manufacturing at home. the ceo of export now is telling us how his company is making it easier than ever for u.s. businesses to sell their products in china. >>> mitt romney's energy plan for drilling and mining on public lands will create millions of jobs and bring millions for state revenue. so who should be in control, the state or the feds? we'll be discussing that, coming up next. ♪ . i know the name of eight princesses. i'm an expert on softball. and tea parties. i'll have more awkward conversations than i'm equipped for because i'm raising two girls on my own. i'll worry about the economy more than a few times before they're grown. but it's for them, so i've found a way. who matters most to you says the most about you. massmutual is owned by our policyholders so they matter most to us. massmutual. we'll help you get there. monarch of marketing analysis. with the ability to improve roi through seo all by cob. and you...rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle... and go. you can even
deficit and it suggested the tax revenue down 4.6% year over year and at the same time showing the government spending goes, 8% in the month of august. doesn't sound like austerity to me or the oil traders and after they came up oil reversed direction. more worried about europe. melissa: gold is an interesting story as well. price topping out at $1,800 was the estimate and morgan stanley thinks silver will outperform. i don't know about that. what do you think? phil: i think silver will. i am bullish on gold and i think $1,800 -- we will go a lot higher. the market is consolidating after a historic run. there will be a lot of quantitative easing coming out of the table and we know that will be bullish. in the middle east, at in the consensus of the middle east. one of the things they pointed out was india demand. i am not worried about that. part of that was because they had a strike. they were upset with the jeweler's. that will rebound. with quantitative easing there will be a lot of hot money going into india. lori: i agree with what you said. phil flynn, price cooper's grou
. >> i don't see how we will pay for the deficit without -- stuart: un obama supporter? >> i am not an obama supporter but i still can't believe a situation where we will get out of this without doing something. we are not raising revenue and -- stuart: you raise revenue by lowering tax rates and getting rid of some loopholes and deductions. that is how you raise revenue. >> if we remove loopholes for taxes it is the same as raising taxes. right? stuart: somebody was in my ear. say that again. >> if you reduce the loopholes on people taking deductions you are essentials raising taxes. stuart: when you lower tax rate you create incentive to work harder or take a second job and therefore you boost the economy and bring more money to the central government without raising tax rates for taxes themselves. i got to go. glad you stuck around. tax reform. that was very useful. come back when we have more time. dow industrials are down 101 points. next the women's vote. especially unmarried women leans heavily towards president obama. why is that? have they not been paying attention the
to be overcome, you have to overcome two different deficits. i understand if you are on the wrong side of that game the other night, you have a bad taste in your mouth right now. stuart: you do think there could be some loss of business for you guys? >> there is some chatter out there, stuart. i have heard the customers, to the counter and say that that call will put them on the sidelines for a wild. now, of course, if you are on the right side of that, you are ready to be an action for the coming week. stuart: [laughter] i guess so. give me the odds that the regular refs will come back very soon. >> they are a 129 favorite to be back. maybe not this sunday, but certainly the next. they will come together. they will meet somewhere in the middle. i do not know if they will make it by this sunday, but by next sunday they will be there. stuart: wynn las vegas, any plans to give the money back if there is another lousy call that changes outcome of the end of the game? >> i have been on the wrong side of a lot of games, two. it all evens out in the wash, stuart. i am sure you have had somet
? lori: you can't say that. why stay in france? will this do anything to rein in the country's deficit? could the u.s. ever go this far to raise revenues. here to weigh in, curtis dubai, senior policy analyst at the heritage foundation. you heard our shock and awe. record unemployment in france, barrage of data to economic stagnation. how could this tax rate not be devastating? >> doubt it will be. we should be grateful to france showing the folly of raising taxes that you confiscate three quarters of the income created by job createtores and income earns. it will be just as bad here if we go down that path. lori: greatful to france but a lot of people are hoping we'll go down that path. i mean we're at 35% individual income tax rate, curtis. again a lot of people are fearful if obama wins re-election that is the path we're headed on. what do you expect to happen to tax rates if he is reelected? >> you know, president obama does want to raise taxes. i don't think we'll ever go back to rates in the 70s of 75%. we've been there, done that. i don't think we'll go back to level. however pr
it is the president's own deficit and debt commission recommended something similar on tax reform, bringing down all the tax rates, expanding the base and eliminating tax credits and tax loopholes. dagen: ronald reagan, he did it. and then congress messed it up. bret, it was great to talk to you as always. thank you very much. please everybody -- well i know you all watch bret at 6:00 p.m. eastern on the fox news channel every night. if you don't, well, there you have it. you know what you will see tonight and every night. thanks bret. >> thanks. connell: hillary clinton, with some comments with higher taxes on rich people around the world, not just here, everywhere. we will talk to the judge andrew napolitano and get his thoughts on that. dagen: do you want to take a look at the treasury markets too? connell: i guess. dagen: we did a whole segment on treasury yields. here you go. connell: time now for your fox business brief. take a look at shares of american greetings today, they have been surging. the company received a go private offer from a group led by a ceo. look at that 16%. the offer 17, 1
into recession and became a deficit. when the home price boom ended we had the pan ic of '08. they were terrific as they lasted, but ended in tears. how about the current bubble? that would be federal debt. it's not widely understood, but that money that ben bernanke has been printing has been used to buy that debt and that's pushed treasury prices way up, bubble level. it is a bubble. what happens when it bursts? it will eventually. pretty soon people who lend it will say you can't pay it back and then you have killed the dollar. and the interest rates goes straight up and the economy goes straight down and ben will be unable to print out of trouble because it was printing that got us into the mess in the first place, i do not have a solution, only the conviction that we're indeed in another bubble and i don't know exactly how it will shake out. i don't know which investment will do well eventually, but i do know that this bubble will burst and when that happens, there will be a river of tears. so anyway, i've been to a lot of places. you know, i've helped a lot of people save a lot of money. b
.s. and europe is we have a current account deficit in the u.s. if and when the bond tells us to get our act together, we are most vulnerable, in particular the dollar is most vulnerable and then yes we will act. but then it is going to be just as painful. connell: forced to act, money keeps coming in here rates couldn't be any lower than they are right now as the money floods into the united states as opposed to going out of it. the point is you don't see an october surprise, something out of europe that really upsets is blows up and becomes a big issue for our election? >> well, we we have a chronic condition in europe, you can consider it hurry up and wait or groundhog day. the euro is around 1.28. it is not at parity. so the market is getting used to it. the reason the market is getting used to it is because the head of the european central bank has imposed a process under the euro zone, it is a messy process, but we have to think about what standard do we hold politicians up to and policymakers and we have a mess in the u.s., in the u.k., in japan, in the euro zone. the euro is just bec
Search Results 0 to 46 of about 47 (some duplicates have been removed)